Banjo Hangout Logo
Banjo Hangout Logo

Premier Sponsors


 All Forums
 Playing the Banjo
 Playing Advice: Bluegrass (Scruggs) Styles
 ARCHIVED TOPIC: What is going on here??


Please note this is an archived topic, so it is locked and unable to be replied to. You may, however, start a new topic and refer to this topic with a link: http://www.banjohangout.org/archive/409178

mikeb210 - Posted - 06/24/2026:  07:11:23


The Balsam Range version of Streamline Cannonball came on my radio earlier and I decided to finally post the question that always strikes me when I hear this song: HOW?!
Is Marc Pruett using standard Scruggs style playing or is there some secret, advanced technique that I've never heard about that enables that combination of speed and clarity? I’m not asking “how do I play faster?” or anything like that. I think I’m just blown away and I can’t believe it’s real. Is he really just that fast or is it some trickery that makes it sound that way? I cant even match the tempo with open rolls, forget adding the slides and pull offs I seem to be hearing. It just blows my mind and if nothing else I wanted to share my appreciation of a phenomenal banjo player.

Have a great day!

Ira Gitlin - Posted - 06/24/2026:  07:37:16


No trickery.

I can't do it either, but I've seen it done.

youtube.com/watch?v=QaAbUYyYFVc

youtube.com/watch?v=lNRFoFjphOk

Alex Z - Posted - 06/24/2026:  07:59:06


". . . standard Scruggs style . . . "



Yep.  At about 180 beats per minute, that's what standard Scruggs style sounds like.  Not many players can get to that point cleanly.  Impressive!

Texasbanjo - Posted - 06/24/2026:  08:15:44


I've been in some jams with pickers that could pick that fast. To me, it's just too fast as the notes begin to get blurred instead of clean and clear.

martyjoe - Posted - 06/24/2026:  08:22:16


There’s a fella in our Friday night jam that can play at those speeds plus some because he’s doing it with a tenor with a flat pick and a guitar. Boy when he gets wrong (only occasionally) it goes spectacularly wrong. What a player!

mikeb210 - Posted - 06/24/2026:  08:40:36


quote:

Originally posted by Alex Z

". . . standard Scruggs style . . . "



Yep.  At about 180 beats per minute, that's what standard Scruggs style sounds like.  Not many players can get to that point cleanly.  Impressive!






This cracked me up because as I was typing it I was thinking "theres nothing 'standard' about this!" I guess I meant is it really just one guy using one hand to pick all those notes?? I know it is, but the existence of that kind of ability seems as likely as two banjo pickers playing in unison but alternating every other note. One learned the even, the other learned the odd and together they play at Pruett speed. 

RB3 - Posted - 06/24/2026:  08:41:52


Marc Pruett's kickoff is the 16 measures that comprise the verse of the song. It takes him 10 seconds to do that. That's 192 beats/minute.  As others have said, there's no trickery; it's just pure Scruggs-style playing with testosterone oozing out from under his picks.



Here's another one from J. D. Crowe, back in the days when his hair was still red, and he still wore his strap over his right shoulder.



J. D. Crowe - Train 45



 


Edited by - RB3 on 06/24/2026 08:44:44

earlstanleycrowe - Posted - 06/24/2026:  08:46:54


What's the saying? I wish I could do that, and then not do it?

It's super impressive but I don't actually like listening to it. The old Roy Acuff version is more my speed.

Just my subjective take. There's a lot of Marc's playing that I really enjoy listening to, though.

mikeb210 - Posted - 06/24/2026:  08:47:54


That Train 45 video was already in my saved folder on youtube! I really like that version of the song and the video has lots of fun details too. The lady near the end who’s holding binoculars backwards and upside down always makes me laugh

mikeb210 - Posted - 06/24/2026:  08:54:09


quote:

Originally posted by earlstanleycrowe

What's the saying? I wish I could do that, and then not do it?



It's super impressive but I don't actually like listening to it. The old Roy Acuff version is more my speed.



Just my subjective take. There's a lot of Marc's playing that I really enjoy listening to, though.






I’m in total agreement with you. I’m only interested in playing that fast as a parlor trick but I don't see a way to express emotion in that kind of speed. The speed kind of overrides any emotion and turns it to joyous amusement. That's extremely valuable and much needed, but its not what I’m trying to do with music. You wouldnt play like that to sing about loss or hope but its perfect if you want to sing about a fast train fastly going fast. 

earlstanleycrowe - Posted - 06/24/2026:  08:54:18


The Jim Van Cleve Train 45 makes J.D. sound slow by comparison.

 



RB3 - Posted - 06/24/2026:  09:36:07


earlstanleycrowe,

The kickoffs on the Van Cleve recording and on the J. D. Crowe video both take 20 seconds, so the tempos for both performances are essentially the same.

Old Hickory - Posted - 06/24/2026:  09:56:43


quote:

Originally posted by mikeb210

Is Marc Pruett using standard Scruggs style playing or is there some secret, advanced technique that I've never heard about that enables that combination of speed and clarity? . . . Is he really just that fast or is it some trickery that makes it sound that way?






Yes, it's really that fast.



The only "trick" is the technique known as KISS: Keep It Simple, Stupid.



Seriously, for most mere mortals the key to playing this fast is to pare it down. No hot licks with broken patterns. Minimal thumb-index-thumb-middle or backward roll. Lots of forward roll and roll-based licks that substitute for melody.



In other words: Take out all the "advanced" stuff and stick to the most basic Scruggs technique, executed extremely well.



When the Dillards first came on the scene in the early 60s, some critics accused them of speeding up the tapes. Of course, it was real. But while he was very fast, it sounds like Doug Dillard wasn't as fast as Marc Pruett.



Here he is, several decades older, still pretty fast. Same tune.

earlstanleycrowe - Posted - 06/24/2026:  10:28:59


quote:

Originally posted by RB3

earlstanleycrowe,



The kickoffs on the Van Cleve recording and on the J. D. Crowe video both take 20 seconds, so the tempos for both performances are essentially the same.






I used one of those tempo-tapper websites and it seems like J.D. was in the 180 bpm range and Jim was in the 190 range. Of course this is limited by my own ability to tap on tempo.



I can say that I find J.D.'s version a lot more listenablesmiley.

mmuussiiccaall - Posted - 06/24/2026:  12:11:26


here it is at 70% tempo and it sounds like the usual Earl style


mikeb210 - Posted - 06/24/2026:  12:27:06


Boy that last 30% sure makes a difference! Sounds great at 70% too

mikeb210 - Posted - 06/24/2026:  12:35:08


quote:

Originally posted by Old Hickory

quote:

Originally posted by mikeb210

Is Marc Pruett using standard Scruggs style playing or is there some secret, advanced technique that I've never heard about that enables that combination of speed and clarity? . . . Is he really just that fast or is it some trickery that makes it sound that way?






Yes, it's really that fast.



The only "trick" is the technique known as KISS: Keep It Simple, Stupid.



Seriously, for most mere mortals the key to playing this fast is to pare it down. No hot licks with broken patterns. Minimal thumb-index-thumb-middle or backward roll. Lots of forward roll and roll-based licks that substitute for melody.



In other words: Take out all the "advanced" stuff and stick to the most basic Scruggs technique, executed extremely well.



When the Dillards first came on the scene in the early 60s, some critics accused them of speeding up the tapes. Of course, it was real. But while he was very fast, it sounds like Doug Dillard wasn't as fast as Marc Pruett.



Here he is, several decades older, still pretty fast. Same tune.






Ken, I appreciate you linking to that tune. I’m going to have to spend some time studying his hands and see if I cant gain some ground on that song as well. I find its much easier to learn by ear if I can watch the hands at the same time. My ears will hear all kinds of movement and then the film shows that its all happening in one position. So much to learn

Laurence Diehl - Posted - 06/24/2026:  13:01:46


I met Marc 50 years ago back when he had the music store in Asheville. He was good then, and he’s had plenty of time to practice since.
Hard driving bluegrass was always his happy place.

Old Hickory - Posted - 06/24/2026:  13:10:33


quote:

Originally posted by mikeb210

I find its much easier to learn by ear if I can watch the hands at the same time. My ears will hear all kinds of movement and then the film shows that its all happening in one position. 






Yes. It can be deceptive.



I'm going out on a limb guessing this, but I think the first string D being only a major third (three frets) higher than the second string, is part of what allows what we hear as upward movement to take place in very little space.



It's something I only unravel if I sit down to work out something form a recording, which I don't do so much any more.

mikeb210 - Posted - 06/24/2026:  14:52:17


quote:

Originally posted by Laurence Diehl

I met Marc 50 years ago back when he had the music store in Asheville. He was good then, and he’s had plenty of time to practice since.

Hard driving bluegrass was always his happy place.






This explains why I've never seen a picture of the man without a huge smile on his face 

Laurence Diehl - Posted - 06/24/2026:  15:48:51


quote:

Originally posted by mikeb210

quote:

Originally posted by Laurence Diehl

I met Marc 50 years ago back when he had the music store in Asheville. He was good then, and he’s had plenty of time to practice since.

Hard driving bluegrass was always his happy place.






This explains why I've never seen a picture of the man without a huge smile on his face 






Ha! Yeah, Marc never needed drugs - he's already "high" on banjo. 

Tractor1 - Posted - 06/25/2026:  05:34:34


seems llke I figured this at 200 once and decided to quit going for the impossible after that--Merle could always nail scruggs and crowe goodies




Edited by - Tractor1 on 06/25/2026 05:36:42

Ira Gitlin - Posted - 06/25/2026:  05:49:37


FWIW, the Johnson Mountain Boys clip of "Long Journey Home" (linked in my comment above) is around 192 BPM. Tom Adams was 29 years old when that was recorded, and playing with a band that toured constantly, so he was young and very much in practice. There was also caffeine involved, so I've been told. ;^)

Watching the video of that entire "Old Schoolhouse" concert, I've noticed that while there are a few real burners like that (e.g. "John Henry" and "Going To Georgia", they're always followed by much slower numbers. Good bands understand the entertainment value of speed, but they also understand pacing over the course of a set.

mikeb210 - Posted - 06/25/2026:  07:59:11


Nobody click those links!

dev_qorh - Posted - 06/25/2026:  08:15:29


:D

earlstanleycrowe - Posted - 06/25/2026:  09:45:22


quote:

Originally posted by Ira Gitlin

FWIW, the Johnson Mountain Boys clip of "Long Journey Home" (linked in my comment above) is around 192 BPM. Tom Adams was 29 years old when that was recorded, and playing with a band that toured constantly, so he was young and very much in practice. There was also caffeine involved, so I've been told. ;^)



Watching the video of that entire "Old Schoolhouse" concert, I've noticed that while there are a few real burners like that (e.g. "John Henry" and "Going To Georgia", they're always followed by much slower numbers. Good bands understand the entertainment value of speed, but they also understand pacing over the course of a set.






As impressive as Tom's playing is on that song, I'm even more impressed by David McLaughlin's mandolin break at that speed.



 



 




Edited by - earlstanleycrowe on 06/25/2026 09:46:58

Ira Gitlin - Posted - 06/25/2026:  09:53:20


Yeah. Makes my hand hurt just to listen to it.

Bill Rogers - Posted - 06/26/2026:  13:04:22


Then there’s this guy:

 



youtube.com/watch?v=NxwZ-yNWOC4

mikeb210 - Posted - 06/26/2026:  14:37:23


quote:

Originally posted by Bill Rogers

Then there’s this guy:

 



youtube.com/watch?v=NxwZ-yNWOC4






Yeah, he's alright... I would have followed him with 16 bars of a single note too, what else can you do?? I took his Artistworks class for a year and I think it really helped my playing but several years later I’m still struggling to understand what any of it meant. He's one of a kind and I'll never stop kicking myself for missing Bela's Bluegrass Camp several years ago(pre covid times.) Bela, Noam, Mike Munford, Allison Brown and (I think) Ron Block were the instructors. 

Tractor1 - Posted - 06/26/2026:  19:49:08


quote:

Originally posted by Bill Rogers

Then there’s this guy:

 



youtube.com/watch?v=NxwZ-yNWOC4






I count 18 in a half minute times 8 =147 bpm if I am right

Tractor1 - Posted - 06/26/2026:  20:08:12


another original 




Edited by - Tractor1 on 06/26/2026 20:09:15

earlstanleycrowe - Posted - 06/27/2026:  08:05:47


quote:

Originally posted by Tractor1

another original 








Wow!

adl1132 - Posted - 07/06/2026:  21:49:07


The inclination of bands to play in excess of 150 bpm is something that I have never understood. There are lots of tunes/songs which are appropriately played at a quick tempo. But what is gained with a speed of 160 or 180 bpm, beyond impressing an audience with raw speed? Is it enjoyable to hear the band members fighting to hang on for 2-3 minutes? Even if everyone can handle the tempo, does the melody come through better, sweeter, is the sound of the instruments improved by playing them at 180 bpm? No, no and no, in my opinion. In my mind, it is just the band saying “Now for this next number, nothing matters except pure raw speed. Don’t look for anything else, just be impressed with how blazing fast we can play our instruments.” I would love to see large numbers of people get up and walk out when that happens—or alternately, no applause at all.

I would walk miles to hear Ron Stewart do all the wonderful, creative things he does with a 5-string. I wouldn’t walk around the corner to hear even the most popular of groups play at breakneck speeds. There is no creativity or subtlety at 180 bpm.


RB-1 - Posted - 07/06/2026:  23:03:58


My thoughts exactly!

HSmith - Posted - 07/07/2026:  01:19:05


I'm with Allan & Bruno here. After 50+ years of playing and listening to banjo and bluegrass in general, I ceased to be impressed by excessive speed years ago. The key word here is 'excessive'. Some songs and tunes are meant to be quick, but even they should not be rushed. To my ears, a banjo played excessively fast just becomes a jangle of noise, and any subtlety, taste and tone go out of the window. At more modest speeds, the player can (if he has the skills) produce the optimum tone and execute ornaments and embellishments like slides, pull-offs, chokes and hammer-ons to their fullest effect. Give me a well-played tune at moderate pace any day over a testosterone-fuelled race.


Edited by - HSmith on 07/07/2026 01:20:21

Jack Baker - Posted - 07/07/2026:  07:25:35


Banjo is no longer an instrument, it is just a light speed machine....congrats speed freaks....Jack


 

Originally posted by earlstanleycrowe

quote:

Originally posted by Ira Gitlin

FWIW, the Johnson Mountain Boys clip of "Long Journey Home" (linked in my comment above) is around 192 BPM. Tom Adams was 29 years old when that was recorded, and playing with a band that toured constantly, so he was young and very much in practice. There was also caffeine involved, so I've been told. ;^)



Watching the video of that entire "Old Schoolhouse" concert, I've noticed that while there are a few real burners like that (e.g. "John Henry" and "Going To Georgia", they're always followed by much slower numbers. Good bands understand the entertainment value of speed, but they also understand pacing over the course of a set.






As impressive as Tom's playing is on that song, I'm even more impressed by David McLaughlin's mandolin break at that speed.



 



Edited by - Jack Baker on 07/07/2026 07:30:53

chuckv97 - Posted - 07/07/2026:  07:45:32


There is an element of hotrod-ism in other musics as well,, “shredding” on rock guitar, SRV in blues, Paganini in classical music, etc. , , , we wuz all young once, even Earl.

Jack Baker - Posted - 07/07/2026:  07:59:09


Truer words were never spoken....I have to put an extra surge protector on my Computer for these 4 hundred miles per second gems...HA

Tractor1 - Posted - 07/07/2026:  08:19:00


once people read the book and understand Earl's licks --they kinda understand his melodies



if it is a rendition of endless but non related phrases that were in the vicinity to be grabbed next --played cleanly at excessive speed--that is what gets the oohs and aahs from the up and coming ---however the actual music is not something to be remembered and hummed --there is no hook besides the dexterity extravaganza--



music offers many other useful and even more useful moods--for example old timey and celtic type fiddle tunes at tempos that let the'' deep tones of a good instrument ''surface -- the sadness in a minor or blues bend  love to linger --a love by the listener also--syncopation comes to life much more when it has time to take effect



 



not to diss a good barn burner once and a while--but that is not king of the mountain stuff either



my opinion I ask no agreement


Edited by - Tractor1 on 07/07/2026 08:29:16

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Privacy Consent (EU/GDPR Only)

Copyright 2026 Banjo Hangout. All Rights Reserved.





Hangout Network Help

View All Topics  |  View Categories

0.1069336