Banjo Hangout Logo
Banjo Hangout Logo

Premier Sponsors


 All Forums
 Other Banjo-Related Topics
 Collector's Corner
 ARCHIVED TOPIC: Vega Tubaphone X vs. B&D Silverbell


Please note this is an archived topic, so it is locked and unable to be replied to. You may, however, start a new topic and refer to this topic with a link: http://www.banjohangout.org/archive/294053

banjotrader - Posted - 11/07/2014:  09:20:23


Hi there, wanted to get some perspective on real life experiences of the tonal differences between an early 20's Vega Tubaphone X #9 vs. an early 20's Bacon Bacon Silver Bell...  I've only heard audio clips, and it seems that the Silverbell produces a rounder sound, but the Tubaphone is capable of a more penetrating mid/high.  THoughts??



Also, is there any real sound difference between the Style M and X, or is it all in the added look...



Edited by - banjotrader on 11/07/2014 09:22:57

mikehalloran - Posted - 11/07/2014:  09:38:42


The second question is easier to answer. The M came in two sizes and there's a big difference between the two. The Vegaphone is the M with a resonator and a 23" scale. The M didn't usually come with a resonator but, after 1923, you could get them at any Vega dealer and they fit perfectly. The X and M of the same size with the same tailpiece (the M never came with the same 'piece but can be retrofitted) can be set up to sound similar.



As to the first question, it depends. You really need to play a few.


banjotrader - Posted - 11/07/2014:  10:00:38


So an X over an M  {both 17 Frets setup similarly} is just bling value?  So for a player, no added value if you dont care about looks.


mikehalloran - Posted - 11/07/2014:  10:28:12


Correct. Throw a Kershner tailpiece on the M. The X usually came with a Kershner or Oettinger while OE on most Ms was a NoKnot.


jbalch - Posted - 11/07/2014:  11:20:10


quote:

Originally posted by banjotrader

...  it seems that the Silverbell produces a rounder sound, but the Tubaphone is capable of a more penetrating mid/high.  THoughts? ...






I currently own a 1925  Silverbell. I have owned style M tubaphones in the past. I think your description above is accurate.  I'd add that the tubaphone produces more (and longer) sustain. I personally really like the Silver Bell sound.



Also - Silver Bell banjos changed several times over the years.  There are at least four different types of tone rings and variations in rims, resonators, etc. Here is a serial number list with some helpful information: acoustudio.dk/BD_and_Bacon_database.html



Silver bell tone rings



1. holes inside & out



2. holes inside (none outside) - my favorite



3. no holes



4. archtop



Edited by - jbalch on 11/07/2014 11:22:59

skip sail - Posted - 11/07/2014:  13:12:22


depends on what you play on it. Tenor,plectrum or 5 string? Trad Jazz with a flatpick, bluegrass with fingerpicks,frailing etc etc.
i personally like them both, a good Tubaphone can knock mosquitos out of the air and dominate a session, the silver bell is a bit warmer and quieter.

banjopa - Posted - 11/08/2014:  06:08:12


I have owned and played both Vega tuba phones and a B&D Silver Bell. My favorite is the Vega. When you play mostly chord melody and improvise, Like I do mostly, I love the tonal response and feel of the Vega. The B&D, IMHO, is the better banjo if you are playing chords in a Dixieland, trad jazz setting. It is a little mellower in tone, has a fatter sound and you can hear yourself play better with all the horns blazing around you. The one I had was the #1 with the no holes tone ring. With all that said, you can set up your banjo to give you the tone you want with the type of bridge, nut, strings, TP, head tension and type and action. All of  which effects the sound and playability of your banjo.


Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Privacy Consent (EU/GDPR Only)

Copyright 2026 Banjo Hangout. All Rights Reserved.





Hangout Network Help

View All Topics  |  View Categories

4.296875E-02