DVD-quality lessons (including tabs/sheet music) available for immediate viewing on any device.
Take your playing to the next level with the help of a local or online banjo teacher.
Weekly newsletter includes free lessons, favorite member content, banjo news and more.
|
Please note this is an archived topic, so it is locked and unable to be replied to. You may, however, start a new topic and refer to this topic with a link: http://www.banjohangout.org/archive/279659
Jim Yates - Posted - 02/13/2014: 10:57:47
Here's a piece by Jim Strecker that appeared in today's Hamilton Spectator: thespec.com/opinion-story/4364...e-seeger/
Edited because I forgot to post the link.
Edited by - Jim Yates on 02/13/2014 10:58:53
kmwaters - Posted - 02/13/2014: 11:21:12
Yeah old Pete could sure stir up controversy. Everyone has an idea what Pete really was, but that's all they are is ideas. Not sure anyone knows. But he did seem to do more good than harm.
Gus Bloch - Posted - 02/13/2014: 11:51:57
Yes, he could stir things up and not just politically. For instance, he is said in the article to have rejected Bel-canto voice training since it wouldn't have taught him to sing like Leadbelly.
I disagree with that notion. Proper voice training can teach someone how to sing effectively which enables a singer to better perform in many chosen styles. He could have used it to mimic whomever he wanted to. That said, it is also quite possible that had he taken those vocal lessons, we might never have enjoyed the singing style he arrived at on his own.
Thanks for sharing the article, Jim.
Jimmy Sutton - Posted - 02/13/2014: 11:53:34
"but that's all they are is ideas" ???
People that knew Pete Seeger do know what he was and he most certainly did do more good than harm. What harm? Teaching hundreds or if not thousands to play banjo?
dfwest - Posted - 02/13/2014: 21:12:11
"Judge a nation by the number of people who can make music themselves" Wow - looks like we might be in trouble!
Dave
Texasbanjo - Posted - 03/06/2014: 17:45:08
Please, if you wish to talk about Pete, go ahead, but leave his politics out of it.
Paul R - Posted - 03/06/2014: 20:38:44
Thanks for this, Jim.
If you don't already have it, get a hold of How Can I Keep from Singing, the bio of Pete published in 1981 by David King Dunaway. It's pretty thorough, done with research from Pete's files, as well as interviews with Pete and others around him.
Bill Rogers - Posted - 03/06/2014: 21:33:49
If you're interested in the politics of a part of the NY folk scene in the 40s and 50s, Google Robbie Lieberman. She's a scholar who has done some of the most thorough research in that area, based on sources, not rumor and hearsay.
raharris - Posted - 03/07/2014: 06:09:26
I'm enjoying "Which Side Are You On?' by Dick Weissman. It can't be called a history because he lived through the era and some of the book is personal reminiscences. History can only be written with the objectivity imposed by time, but reminiscences have their place, and this book is far more than that. Like a good historian he starts with the roots in the 30s and 40s. His writing is both clean that insightful, introducing the reader to the many sub-genres perceived by members of both the folk scene but likely invisible to the general public. The title doesn't suggest that the writer is himself taking a side, but is doing his best to convey the complexity of the revival community.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Privacy Consent (EU/GDPR Only)
Copyright 2026 Banjo Hangout. All Rights Reserved.