Banjo Hangout Logo
Banjo Hangout Logo

Premier Sponsors


 All Forums
 Other Banjo-Related Topics
 Collector's Corner
 ARCHIVED TOPIC: Dating a Fairbanks/Cole/Vega Banjo 1880+


Please note this is an archived topic, so it is locked and unable to be replied to. You may, however, start a new topic and refer to this topic with a link: http://www.banjohangout.org/archive/296508

banjotrader - Posted - 12/22/2014:  15:55:24


Can anyone on BHO share any "bills of sale" / "customer receipts" of Vega Banjos from the 1909-1940 era?  Specifically looking for the SN association.  

I'll update my finding and key information directly below this line, it'll represent the earliest instrument types that I've found.  If anyone has updates, please post and I'll update here:

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



*******************************MOST UP-TO-DATE Information (Updated Mar 29 2016)*******************



Serial Number:



1880-1890: 1000/yr



Earliest Banjos

1890: Faibanks Electric #41

late 1890: Fairbanks Electric Curtis #826

1891: Imperial Electric #1212

1891: Columbian #1792

1892: Senator #1916

1894: Special #12213

1895: Regent #14295

1896: Metal Name Plate ~14900



This dating scheme seems very logical given the Serial-Earliest Seen:

hschwartz.com/FairbanksBanjos/...bers.html





​Whyte Laydie: (Intro 1901): 20343



Tubaphone: (Intro 1909): 25052



Vegaphone (Intro/Launch Jun+ 1923):

      58527 (This instrument is thought to be a prototype Vegaphone from Early 1923, since B. Smakula has quoted 58982 as having a clear "Apr 1923" printed on the instrument)

      60306/61899/62930/63139/63434 (all have mixed Vegaphone identification attributes i.e. Scale/Flanges/Tailpiece/etc..)

      63909 is a fully stamped Vegaphone

    - pdfpiw.uspto.gov/.piw?Docid=01549020 Filed Oct 1923

    - 
hangoutstorage.com/banjohangou...12015.jpgJun 1923 Ad in the Music Trades.  Had also be mentioned in Apr 1923 before the Washington, DC Guild show

    -
Launch in Q3 1923.  First with Professional, Artist & Deluxe.  The Soloist would be introduced in June 1925 (SN ~82000)

    - The Vegaphone model also incorporated a new Resonator called the "Magnatone".  First references to this naming in 1925.





Vegavox (Intro/Launch July 1927 in Crescendo Magazine):  

   92623 (Trademark first use Jun 1927) 

   - tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?...104161353 )

Moderne - 97752

Crescent - 98404



Branding:

First AC Fairbanks Name Plate: ~14900

Last Fairbanks: 26019

First Fairbanks-Vega: 26023

Last Fairbanks-Vega: 52724

First Vega Only Stamp: 52667 (~Jul 1922 - see below))

                   
- This corresponds to within one/two months before David L Day's departure from Vega to Bacon Banjo Co. (Aug-Sep 1922)                      

                   - Vega Company also filed all trademarks of "VEGA" / "TU-BA-PHONE" / "WHYTE LAYDIE"

                                      - [ US Trademarks 164,845 / 161,709 / 161,708 respectively filed in Apr 1922 and Registered Nov 07 1922 ]

                                         Registrations Numbers: 161328 / 161329 / 161330 (hangoutstorage.com/banjohangou...12015.jpg)

                                         The first use claims are a little generous I think, but do support other known facts re: 1889, 1890, etc...

                                      - This time frame provides some possible insight to the advanced notice David L Day provided to Carl Nelson

                                        that he was leaving Vega for the Bacon Banjo Co. Inc.  His exit is thought to have propelled

                                        Carl Nelson to Trademark everything. 



Filed Feb 1908 / Patented July 27th 1909 (patentimages.storage.googleapi...df​):

Last Pending: 25141

Earliest: 25230



Serialization based on this research (Ongoing):

By working from the Cumulative perspective, using the key dates mentioned above you can easily interpolate an weighted set of second degree polynomials with Least squares (3 data points at a time guarantees an R^2=1).  The summary below shows a basic view which aligns very closely to the Modelled findings.



Fairbanks & Cole:

1880-1890: 1000/yr



Fairbanks&Co: (Note Some of these banjos also have Fairbanks & Cole double stamped):



1890: 0-999

1891: 1000-1999

1892: 2000-2999

1893: 3000-3999

1894: 4000-13999

1895: 14000-14999

Metal Nameplate Introduced

1896: 15000-15999

1897: 16000-16999

1898: 17000-17999

1899: 18000-18999
































































































































































































































































































































Year First Last Volume Modeled Volumes Cumulative Comments
1900 19000 19999 1000 1000 20000  
1901 20000 20999 1000 1000 21000  Whyte Laydie Intro ~20343
1902 21000 21999 1000 1000 22000  
1903 22000 22999 1000 1000 23000  
1904 23000 23299 300 300 23300  
1905 23300 23499 200 200 23500  
1906 23500 23999 500 500 24000  Consalvi leaves in early 1906 ~ 23700
1907 24000 24199 200 200 24200  
1908 24200 24999 800 800 25000  
1909 25000 26349 1350 1347 26347  Tubaphone Intro ~25000 & First FB/Vega Stamp
1910 26350 27799 1450 1410 27757  
1911 27800 29149 1350 1379 29136  
1912 29150 29999 850 883 30019  
1913 30000 30799 800 793 30812  
1914 30800 31499 700 703 31515  
1915 31500 32199 700 666 32181  
1916 32200 32999 800 795 32976  
1917 33000 33799 800 800 33776  
1918 33800 34599 800 803 34579  
1919 34600 37099 2500 2517 37096  
1920 37100 42299 5200 5230 42326  
1921 42300 48899 6600 6567 48893  
1922 48900 56799 7900 7904 56797  David L Day leaves~53000, 1st Vega Stamp ~52600
1923 56800 68099 11300 11327 68124  Vegaphone Intro ~58500
1924 68100 77999 9900 9935 78059  
1925 78000 83999 6000 5911 83970  Vegaphone Soloist
1926 84000 88499 4500 4500 88470  Vegaphone Δ Flange ~877XX, Oettinger->Clamshell
1927 88500 93149 4650 4686 93156  Vegavox Intro ~92600
1928 93150 95699 2550 2509 95665  
1929 95700 96899 1200 1198 96863  
1930 96900 97499 600 626 97489  
1931 97500 97899 400 429 97918  
1932 97900 98149 250 232 98150  




















































































1953 98779 98998
1954 98999 99089
1955 99090 99255
1956 99256 99425
1957 99426 99567
1958 99568 99716
1959 99717 100031
1960 100032 100865
1961 100866 101499
1962 101500 102581
1962A-1964A 10347 12600
1964-1970 124000 130247
1971-1972 130248 130392
1972M-1978M 1 1945
1979 1946 1969






Edited by - banjotrader on 03/29/2016 08:30:36

The Old Timer - Posted - 12/22/2014:  18:41:37


Perhaps this website is just what you need? 



 



acousticmusic.org/Identifying-...ga_banjos


G Edward Porgie - Posted - 12/22/2014:  19:11:37


Banjotrader, I think this is a fabulous idea, and I hope you have gtreat success with it. I'm sure there are some reciepts out there, and it would be wonderful to know just how accurate/inaccurate some of the existing information is. It sounds as if you are hoping to piece together a more comprehensive overview of the Vega company, much as Joe Spann has done with Gibson\, or John Hoft is presently com[piling on Orpheum instruments. I'd help you if I could, but I don't even own a Vega banjo at this time, let alone have the original sales slip.

This is a useful endeavor, because in my experience even the factory records can sometimes be misleading. I've found numerous errors in other lists of this type. For example, the Pierce Piano Atlas, which reputedly used information directly from piano companies, is rife with errors. I presently own a Chickering piano which is listed in the atlas as being produced in 1914, even though the factory date stamps show it as being made in 1907, and on my tuning and rebuilding jobs I've encountered many other instruments with date stamps and signatures that didn't jibe with the dates Bob Pierce had collected.

I applaud you and wish you good luck.

bargrasspicker - Posted - 12/23/2014:  08:47:39


mugmumps also has some great info too. mugwumps.com/acf_date.html



Edited by - bargrasspicker on 12/23/2014 08:47:55

Polle Flaunoe - Posted - 12/24/2014:  00:40:55


A chart made on basis of the SN infos by AcousticMusic.Org:





Polle



Edited by - Polle Flaunoe on 12/24/2014 00:49:23

banjotrader - Posted - 12/24/2014:  05:49:29


Thanks Polle.  I suspect you may have the same concerns of the '23-'32 data fluctuations, and then the straight decline.  I have 2 bills of sales so far, one does not fit the model at all.. In fact, it's a 1934 Sales Receipt, but the existing model places the instrument in '26-'27 - I'd approach this with caution assuming it may have been second hand, or for some reason stood on a shelf for years.  



Looking at things from a launch perspective, the Vega Phone is of interest (Jun 1923) - the earliest Vegaphone I can find is SN - 59019.  Any others to push the line in the sand?



Given the extensive work you've done, if the Vega SN sequence is continuous for Banjo/Mandolin/etc., when compared to your Bacon Banjo view, a real problem is apparent; and it's not with your view!



Edited by - banjotrader on 12/24/2014 05:52:58

mikehalloran - Posted - 12/25/2014:  08:59:35


You have other proof than that serial number for a June 1923 date for a Vegaphone?


banjotrader - Posted - 12/25/2014:  11:48:11


My apologies, Jul-Aug '23 is the earliest ad I can find

beezaboy - Posted - 12/25/2014:  12:29:37


The Music Trades - June 9, 1923.




The Music Trades - June 9, 1923

   

banjotrader - Posted - 12/25/2014:  13:09:23


Thanks John, I knew I had seen it somewhere

banjotrader - Posted - 12/25/2014:  17:11:23


Of course the second obvious line in the sand is the Sept 1927 Vegavox launch. It's my understanding that it had been promoted before launch, but officially introduced to trade on ~Sept 10 1927.

mikehalloran - Posted - 12/25/2014:  18:33:15


That doesn't mean that any were shipping in June. 


banjotrader - Posted - 12/25/2014:  20:38:36


Agreed, just a max date for approximation.

banjotrader - Posted - 12/29/2014:  07:17:50


So far, the Serial Numbers sample that I have collected (which is statically valid - since that is my field of expertise) I can make an educated statement that the existing dating chart is approx 2-3 yrs off in the 1930+ era..  and about ~1-2 years off in the 1923+ era.    This validates that the decline wasnt as rapid as Polle's graph of the current model estimates (Thanks for that BTW, it really helps see the trouble areas).  With just a few more datapoints this will allow for a far less skewed view; and is actually a lot closer to Polle's Bacon Banjo graph (which BTW continues to improve on a daily basis).  I did a very deep dive on his view last year, and it is within a month +/- at its highest accuracy.  - Great job Polle...



Edited by - banjotrader on 12/29/2014 07:19:31

Troyer Kirkley - Posted - 12/29/2014:  09:32:40


I have an old Vegaphone plectrum banjo serial Number 89585. It probably dates in the mid 1930s. It is in excellent condition with a great sound. Can anyone add any more info about this classic banjo?

banjotrader - Posted - 12/29/2014:  09:41:24


Hi Clare, this seems consistent with what I've been finding.  The Vegaphone SNs exist before & after the Vegavox introduction in 1927.  Yours would be from late '26-'27 based on the data available.  

However, the intent of this thread is to push the SN to the earliest known by model.  This will help lock a Serial Number to a date in time


mikehalloran - Posted - 12/29/2014:  11:29:16


Your best bets are still Mike Holmes and whatever information that Mike Longworth collected at Martin– I have asked someone to look for that in the Martin archives.



Number of Vegas that have passed through my hands: 100+



Number of those Vegas with the info you are looking for: 0


banjotrader - Posted - 12/29/2014:  11:33:08


K, I know that Greig H has nothing, so mabye Dick B can shed some light on the matter...  Are those your guys?


banjotrader - Posted - 12/30/2014:  10:23:27




Here is a view of the preliminary model with key dates

Apr 1908 (Bill of Sale)

Jun 1923 (Vegaphone Minimum Date)

Sep 1927 (Vegavox Minimum Date)

Jan 1933+ (Vega Serialization) 



I've also checked against Jim Bollman's 1978 estimates, and we are pretty close before 1923 as well.   I have a couple more bills of sale, but seem to be second hand as they generally dont fit anywhere close to any known models.



Edited by - banjotrader on 12/30/2014 10:25:47

banjotrader - Posted - 12/30/2014:  20:29:35


One last note before the new year.  After much review, something jumped out at me when looking over the Bollman data, and my collected stats.  The beginning of year's SN seem to most-always be on flat numbers (i.e. XX000).  Here is a tabular view that summarizes the SNs extremely well.






























































































































































































































































Year First Last Volume  
1900 19000 19999 999  
1901 20000 20999 999  
1902 21000 21999 999  
1903 22000 22999 999  
1904 23000 23299 299  
1905 23300 23499 199  
1906 23500 23999 499  
1907 24000 24199 199  
1908 24200 24999 799  
1909 25000 25999 999  
1910 26000 26999 999  
1911 27000 27999 999  
1912 28000 28999 999  
1913 29000 29999 999  
1914 30000 30999 999  
1915 31000 31999 999  
1916 32000 32999 999  
1917 33000 33999 999  
1918 34000 34999 999  
1919 35000 36999 1999  
1920 37000 39999 2999  
1921 40000 46999 6999  
1922 47000 54999 7999  
1923 55000 63999 8999  VP~59000
1924 64000 72999 8999  
1925 73000 80999 7999  
1926 81000 86999 5999  
1927 87000 92999 5999  VV~92000
1928 93000 94999 1999  
1929 95000 95999 999  
1930 96000 96999 999  
1931 97000 97999 999  
1932 98000 98149 149  
1933 98150 98184 34  


Edited by - banjotrader on 12/30/2014 20:34:36

Pinacate - Posted - 01/01/2015:  10:45:22


Since your serial numbers go from XXXX0 to XXXX9, don't you want your annual volumes to end in 0 (except for 1933 which would be 35)? i.e., add 1 to all your volumes
steve

banjotrader - Posted - 01/01/2015:  11:16:01


Yes, that had been changed above

banjotrader - Posted - 01/03/2015:  11:49:28


Note that all updates are posted at the top of this thread (here)


Nuts - Posted - 01/05/2015:  11:18:14


banjotrader, thanks for posting this information.



 



I checked my Style N tenor and discovered it is within a few digits of the Fairbanks to Vega label cut-off.  



 



First Vega Only Stamp: 52667



 



My Style N has serial number 52655 and is labeled Fairbanks banjo made by the Vega Company. This certainly helps support your serial # 52667 Fairbanks to Vega only label.



 




banjotrader - Posted - 01/05/2015:  11:25:43


Interestingly, I see some leftover Fairbanks by Vega stamps being used until ~52724


mikehalloran - Posted - 01/09/2015:  07:11:09


This makes sense. The number was applied when the banjo was about ready to ship. There is no hard cutoff.



I've seen the Fairbanks by Vega stamp on Vegaphone plectrums with mahogany necks, many also have Tubaphone NO 3 stamped on the dowel and some have both stamps.



It's pretty clear that he dowel was stamped when the neck was made and that he number was applied when the banjo was assembled for shipping which could have been much later--decades later in a few cases but that usually applies more to he pots.


GerryMac - Posted - 01/14/2015:  19:49:13


Hi Banjotrader

Good to hear from you.

The S/N of my Vegaphone De Luxe is 67392. According to Mugwumps this dates it at 1925 although on your blog you show 1924.
Please note, it is NOT a No. 9 Style X as you said you own in your post in BHO.
It has abalone shell along the bottom edge of the pot and 'Vegaphone' on the dowel stick. It's the big pot version - 11 & 13/16" with 30 hooks and a beautiful deep tone.

I bought it in England in Aug 2010 but, on doing some research after its purchase, I'm almost sure that my English seller got it in Denver, Co, as I saw an out-of-date ad, with a contact number in Denver, on an internet auction site describing what I'd bought - almost to a 'T' - but before it was cleaned up.

I love it to bits but I'm actually considering selling it at the mo as I've currently 3 tenors (V de Luxe, Vega Pro & Paramount F) and don't gig as much as I did. I'll sell it in Europe though as the prices in the States are lowish in comparison and there's the postage to consider. However, heart may win over wallet in the end!

I think you may be confusing me with someone else about me selling a banjo to anyone in France and I've never owned a 9X.

Hope that helps

Best wishes.

Gerry

banjotrader - Posted - 01/15/2015:  06:21:21


Thanks Gerry, I'll be sure to include this in my growing repository (now about 2% of total production).  Do send any/all Vega to me in Private Message with photos of the SN & Instrument (anything less than SN 99,000 is welcome)



The sampling now possible to uncover production counts by model is coming to light.  For example, the Tubaphone Deluxe Models from 1909-1923 are about 1.6-1.8% of production.  Tenors being about 35% of them.   So current estimates place Tenor models at ~200.



The accuracy is also growing.  Certain bills of sale validate independently against my model to less than 1 month for 1923 & 1927.  Admittedly, the in-between years (i.e. 1924/1925/1926) are still a bit of a guess on the curve.  However, the good news is that with the SN sequence catches up to the validated SN/Dates.



Edited by - banjotrader on 01/15/2015 06:22:52

banjotrader - Posted - 01/22/2015:  11:04:08


Note that all updates are posted at the top of this thread (here)


mikehalloran - Posted - 01/22/2015:  16:13:36


quote:

Originally posted by banjotrader

Note that all updates are posted at the top of this thread (here)







How do you get to do that? Us regular folks cannot edit after 15 minutes.


Polle Flaunoe - Posted - 01/23/2015:  03:54:53


quote:

Originally posted by mikehalloran

quote:


Originally posted by banjotrader

Note that all updates are posted at the top of this thread (here)








How do you get to do that? Us regular folks cannot edit after 15 minutes.







The Original Poster - OP - can edit the thread at any time.



Polle


banjotrader - Posted - 02/05/2015:  11:13:57


In order to tighten up the model a bit, Im looking for any key dates from 1909..1920.  Were there any changes/introductions to Vega / Fairbanks Banjo/MandoBanjo/etc...  that can be isolated?


banjotrader - Posted - 02/12/2015:  19:57:35


Folks, I've loaded some 2200 Serial numbers into my model from Gruhn, Bernunzios, Smakula, Bollman, Mike Longworth.  I have many sale records validated by Mike Longworth.  I'll now be able to get a more accurate view of production by product line.  Stay tuned


Andy FitzGibbon - Posted - 02/14/2015:  13:40:26


I have several hundred numbers that I've collected on index cards. The challenge is how to get them to you- that's a lot of Xeroxing.

Andy

banjotrader - Posted - 02/14/2015:  13:56:48


Andy, id certainly welcome maybe if you could place as many as possible in pictures. Many on one page is fine. The more the better. Next steps will be self reporting. But Bollman and Smukula have many more which I'll likely collect this summer when I go down to Nazareth for unrelated research.

Andy FitzGibbon - Posted - 02/14/2015:  14:53:05


I work for Bob Smakula, and I am the one who maintains our collection of Vega numbers.

Andy

banjotrader - Posted - 02/14/2015:  14:59:57


Oh great, would multiple cards per picture be feasible instead of one-at-a-time photocopies? PM me and we can exchange emails.

mainejohn - Posted - 02/15/2015:  10:50:46


I have three 20's Vega's and I'd be happy to share the history/photos/serial numbers with either one of you (Andy or Banjotrader). Good day for me to do that as I'm snowed in here in Maine with nothing better to do.


banjotrader - Posted - 02/15/2015:  11:13:25


Hi John, I'd love your information. PM me when you have a sec. I just snowblowed my hard, now 7ft.

hbick2 - Posted - 12/25/2015:  03:05:05


Hi,



Thanks for assembling this list. Here is some more information.



I have photos of an earlier Senator, #1916. It was listed for sale by Leo Coulson of Intermountain.  Also, you haven't listed Special Electrics. The earliest I have photos of is #16276. 



The earliest Fairbanks banjo with a nameplate that I have records for is #14918. It was sold on Ebay in 2006. There is no model designation but it has an oak neck and engraved inlays like an Electric No. 1 of the period. The rim is describes as being like a "Special". It was restored by Smakula Fretted Instruments.



Harry Bickel



Louisville, KY


banjotrader - Posted - 12/25/2015:  15:26:17


Thanks Harry, I've added your findings to this research.  thanks for your help on this, its very much appreciated.


Andy FitzGibbon - Posted - 12/26/2015:  04:36:34


quote:
Originally posted by hbick2

Hi,



Thanks for assembling this list. Here is some more information.



I have photos of an earlier Senator, #1916. It was listed for sale by Leo Coulson of Intermountain.  Also, you haven't listed Special Electrics. The earliest I have photos of is #16276. 



The earliest Fairbanks banjo with a nameplate that I have records for is #14918. It was sold on Ebay in 2006. There is no model designation but it has an oak neck and engraved inlays like an Electric No. 1 of the period. The rim is describes as being like a "Special". It was restored by Smakula Fretted Instruments.



Harry Bickel



Louisville, KY






#14918 was my own banjo for a while, and I did the restoration on it. I was never entirely convinced that the neck and rim were original to each other, or that the Fairbanks plate was original to the banjo. It seemed odd that a fairly fancy Oak neck would be paired with a cheap "Special" grade rim, and the rim did not have a serial number stamped on it. The fact that the dowel stick had no model designation stamped on it was also unusual. It could have been an odd put-together at the factory, or perhaps early in its life by some enterprising tinkerer. The black-finished dowel stick always made me wonder if there was anything under the finish, like model designations or an A. C. Fairbanks stamp.

Andy

joe28675 - Posted - 01/19/2016:  16:40:40


If memory serves me correctly, Bill Camp in Minneapolis, now deceased, had a Vega stamp made and actually stamped a few dowel sticks for Bart Reiter. That might explain some of these odd Vega banjos.
Several Vega banjos have passed through my hands over the years and I recorded info on 50+ of them. Early on, the info I collected was rather sparse (model, scale length and rim diameter mostly) but you are welcome to what I have.
Until recently, I owned Fairbanks # 21077 Whyte Laydie No.2, 27 7/8" scale and a 11 1/2" pot.

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Privacy Consent (EU/GDPR Only)

Copyright 2026 Banjo Hangout. All Rights Reserved.





Hangout Network Help

View All Topics  |  View Categories

5.859375E-02