DVD-quality lessons (including tabs/sheet music) available for immediate viewing on any device.
Take your playing to the next level with the help of a local or online banjo teacher.
Weekly newsletter includes free lessons, favorite member content, banjo news and more.
Hey all,
i'm in the process of planning my first banjo build. At the moment i am thinking about moving the 5th string tuner to the 6th fret, just to keep the neck a little bit more clear. Are there any major disadvantages to this alternative design? Or is it just tradition to keep the tuner at the 5th?
As i don't play the banjo (yet), i am wondering what the consequences are in terms of different tunings, string tension and playability..
Does it make sense? what do you think?
yes, that might be true, and i will probably try the tunneled 5th string on my next build. But for this one i want to go another way. I am going to mount a guitar tuner flipped around so that the knob is above the fretboard. Nevertheless i want to shift the whole thing up the fretboard.
Edited by - banjo_maudit on 10/25/2025 09:36:12
If you want to make it standard tuning, having the 5th string peg at the 5th fret means the 1st and 5th strings are the same once you get past the 5th fret. This has all sorts of advantages for playing up the neck, particularly if you want to fret the 5th string with your thumb for melodic runs.
If you place the peg at the 6th fret, your 5th string and 1st string will be a half-step different as you go up the neck past the 5th fret. 1st string 7th fret will be an A, but 5th string 7th fret will be a G#. This will have a major (probably negative) affect on ease of playability up the neck, and make all the typical melodic licks and chords where you fret the 5th string totally different. It might not be insurmountable but it would require a fair amount of adjustment if the player is used to a normal 5th string. It might also open up new possibilities for other licks that require half-step moves, but it's hard to say. And it might not matter if you use alternate tunings, or if you have no intent to use the 5th string for more than a root-note drone.
Overall, without thinking too hard, I would guess it's a net negative on playability. But YMMV.
Edited by - KCJones on 10/25/2025 10:24:42
If it we me who was going to build a 5-string banjo, I think I'd eliminate the 5th-string tuner altogether and instead modify the width of the neck to accommodate the length of the 5th string from the peghead to the bridge. Here's a video that better explains what I'm talking about...
I've seen at least one banjo with the 5th peg at the 7th fret. As others have pointed out, effect on playability will depend on whether one frets the fifth string or not - many melodic clawhammer players do, and many others (including me) never do.
I would have more concern with the idea of a guitar tuner mounted so the peg sat above the fretboard. I don't see how this would even work, and think it would definitely be in the way even if it did.
quote:
Originally posted by buntnesseli am building an open back banjo and i am looking forward learning the clawhammer style. how common is it to fret the fifth string?
It doesn't matter how common fretting the fifth string is in clawhammer. What matters is whether you'll some day want to fret the fifth string. If you do and your fifth string is entering at the sixth fret instead of the fifth, the fingering to accommodate that one-fret difference can become anything from awkward to difficult.
But, sure. If you won't ever fret the fifth string, this is a non-issue.
Srill, I'd throw the question back at you: Seeing as you don't yet play, in what way do you believe your playing will be enhanced by changing an aspect of banjo design that has caused players no discernible problem for around 150 years?
More simply: What is your compelling reason for not keeping the fifth string tuner at the fifth fret?
ok thanks for your input. I thought it would be a good idea, because for me (only guitar player) the 5th peg looks like an obstacle on the neck. But now i decided to stick with the traditional position at least for this first build. Then i can learn the banjo and hopefully make a better decision whether i need the 5th on the 5th or not.
Edited by - banjo_maudit on 10/26/2025 23:58:48
quote:
Originally posted by WobbaWell, in pictures of banjos in the 1700s and early 1800s, the fifth peg was quite a bit lower than it is now. Back then all banjos were fretless. In the surviving illustrations it looks always looks like they put the fifth string peg about where we have the 7th fret nowadays.
It's been around the fifth fret for as long as the banjo has had five strings and a circular rim (meaning Sweeney onward).
quote:
Originally posted by Stu D Baker-HawkIf it we me who was going to build a 5-string banjo, I think I'd eliminate the 5th-string tuner altogether and instead modify the width of the neck to accommodate the length of the 5th string from the peghead to the bridge. Here's a video that better explains what I'm talking about...
I did something similar with a wood top banjo. It is intended to be tuned low. For standard tuning, standard strings and a spike at 5 would be needed.
quote:
Originally posted by buntnesselHey all,
i'm in the process of planning my first banjo build. At the moment i am thinking about moving the 5th string tuner to the 6th fret, just to keep the neck a little bit more clear. Are there any major disadvantages to this alternative design? Or is it just tradition to keep the tuner at the 5th?
As i don't play the banjo (yet), i am wondering what the consequences are in terms of different tunings, string tension and playability..
Does it make sense? what do you think?
Vega beat you to the punch when they created the Excell for Alex Hassilev of The Limeliters, except that his was a long neck so the peg went from the 8th to the 9th fret. Erik Darling had a similar neck made years earlier. Vega would build this option into any of their banjos on special order. There was a $100 upcharge for this since it required a hand-carved neck as the machines weren't set up for this. That was a lot of money in, say, 1963.
Before the Shubb and other side access capos, this was the only way to capo the 5th fret. Alex liked to play C tuning capo'd up to F. I got to ask him about it when opening for The Limeliters in 1991. Because these were hand carved, the Excel has a number of variations including the fact that the hand-written labels used different spellings of Excel or Exel or Excell... There was a wide necked version with star position markers at every position that I really liked.
quote:
Originally posted by mikehalloranquote:
Originally posted by buntnesselHey all,
i'm in the process of planning my first banjo build. At the moment i am thinking about moving the 5th string tuner to the 6th fret, just to keep the neck a little bit more clear. Are there any major disadvantages to this alternative design? Or is it just tradition to keep the tuner at the 5th?
As i don't play the banjo (yet), i am wondering what the consequences are in terms of different tunings, string tension and playability..
Does it make sense? what do you think?Vega beat you to the punch when they created the Excell for Alex Hassilev of The Limeliters, except that his was a long neck so the peg went from the 8th to the 9th fret. Erik Darling had a similar neck made years earlier. Vega would build this option into any of their banjos on special order. There was a $100 upcharge for this since it required a hand-carved neck as the machines weren't set up for this. That was a lot of money in, say, 1963.
Before the Shubb and other side access capos, this was the only way to capo the 5th fret. Alex liked to play C tuning capo'd up to F. I got to ask him about it when opening for The Limeliters in 1991. Because these were hand carved, the Excel has a number of variations including the fact that the hand-written labels used different spellings of Excel or Exel or Excell... There was a wide necked version with star position markers at every position that I really liked.
The description at Frets.com was an enjoyable read!
A fifth string that is open to the nut has interesting tuning possibilities too. making it work in standard tuning, without a spike, might be achievable with a very skinny string. I know .007's are available. I think it would take a .005?
This poorly played demo ends with a run down the open fifth string. Tuning is low A
Edited by - Maurice McMurry on 10/29/2025 13:39:22