Page: 1 2
Some crazy stuff being reported found by new technology, Synthetic Aperture Radar, shows spiral cylinders reaching far into the Earth. Total structure may dwarf what is above ground. Any thoughts on this?
Been waitin fer this thread.. :0)
It causes me...
To wonder ..
How advanced were our forebearers were...
Did they get to smart for thier own good..?
Other pyrahmids..in the world might be worth checking this way..or method.
Yeah, the whole "ancient advanced civilizations lost to history" thing sure seems to have legs. I do think that humans have been knocking around for a long long time here. I don't think that aliens are required for any of this, but I'm open to find out.
quote:
Originally posted by banjo bill-eSome crazy stuff being reported found by new technology, Synthetic Aperture Radar, shows spiral cylinders reaching far into the Earth. Total structure may dwarf what is above ground. Any thoughts on this?
There is a great deal of evidence pointing to the age of the Egyptian pyramids dating to much older than the conventional story. The pyramids are not burial chambers, as archaeologists would have us believe, and they are likewise situated in what appears to be a careful alignment with certain stars. The jury is still out, but the new evidence is hotly disputed by conventional academics, whose funding is dependent upon repeating their narrative.
" ..... funding is dependent upon repeating their narrative..... ."
Well, I'll be a monkey's uncle!! 
quote:
Originally posted by Eulaliequote:
Originally posted by banjo bill-eSome crazy stuff being reported found by new technology, Synthetic Aperture Radar, shows spiral cylinders reaching far into the Earth. Total structure may dwarf what is above ground. Any thoughts on this?
There is a great deal of evidence pointing to the age of the Egyptian pyramids dating to much older than the conventional story. The pyramids are not burial chambers, as archaeologists would have us believe, and they are likewise situated in what appears to be a careful alignment with certain stars. The jury is still out, but the new evidence is hotly disputed by conventional academics, whose funding is dependent upon repeating their narrative.
I often hear people make claims about alignment of certain stars, but it has never made sense to me. The Earth rotates and revolves, and only a single star is even close to be stationary from that perspective. If a claim is made about some other star, alignment is totally based on time, not only time of day, and time of year, but also time of millennia, as those stars have moved from where they were when the pyramids were built.
No scientist is paid for repeating what is known (other than teaching), they are paid for creating something new.
Thank you kindly.
youtu.be/0y-Qxw4DLOY?si=EocG37mi-ndcNJtG
Also interesting.
What is that famous quote by P.T. Barnum?
time goes back or forward forever--there are too many ancient structures that are beyond smartypants explanations--explanations that always end up losing to a new awakening--big bangs could be repetitive like a continuous popcorn popper in this part of the infinite ether--we could have have blown our selves to kingdom-come a time or 2 while the continents were trying to drift away from each other--eat drink be merry--rage against the storm--play an assertive scruggs tune with notes that makes everybody cuss
pyramid scheme
Answer 1 - Suddenly people believe what scientists say.
Answer 2 - I've watched Stargate SG1.
Answer 3 - Sand, sand all the way down.
quote:
Originally posted by GrahamHawkerAnswer 1 - Suddenly people believe what scientists say.
Answer 2 - I've watched Stargate SG1.
Answer 3 - Sand, sand all the way down.
Yep...
Worth consiterin..
My mom always told me that she believed some of the ancient civilizations reached some milestones before being wiped out in one way or another, thus the next civilization started over from scratch. There is also "supposed" to be evidence of an atomic weapon being used many centuries ago. Without being political, and with our government the last several years, I think she was right in assuming there had to be much smarter civilizations many years ago, more so than ours today.
quote:
Originally posted by Elmo_SmileyThere is also "supposed" to be evidence of an atomic weapon being used many centuries ago.
This is probably related to Oklo.
quote:
Originally posted by Elmo_SmileyMy mom always told me that she believed some of the ancient civilizations reached some milestones before being wiped out in one way or another, thus the next civilization started over from scratch.
This is deep into fringe 'science'; some people believe that some of the pyramids were used as chemical or electrical power generators, during an earlier time period.
Edited by - pinenut on 03/24/2025 15:51:21
quote:
Originally posted by Corwynquote:
Originally posted by Eulaliequote:
Originally posted by banjo bill-eSome crazy stuff being reported found by new technology, Synthetic Aperture Radar, shows spiral cylinders reaching far into the Earth. Total structure may dwarf what is above ground. Any thoughts on this?
There is a great deal of evidence pointing to the age of the Egyptian pyramids dating to much older than the conventional story. The pyramids are not burial chambers, as archaeologists would have us believe, and they are likewise situated in what appears to be a careful alignment with certain stars. The jury is still out, but the new evidence is hotly disputed by conventional academics, whose funding is dependent upon repeating their narrative.
I often hear people make claims about alignment of certain stars, but it has never made sense to me. The Earth rotates and revolves, and only a single star is even close to be stationary from that perspective. If a claim is made about some other star, alignment is totally based on time, not only time of day, and time of year, but also time of millennia, as those stars have moved from where they were when the pyramids were built.
No scientist is paid for repeating what is known (other than teaching), they are paid for creating something new.
Thank you kindly.
As a scientist, I must take exception to your charming suggestion that "" no scientist is paid for repeating what is known..." Academic scientists of today are more concerned with funding than with discovery or truth. Have you read the literature on fake papers lately?
https://www.science.org/content/article/fake-scientific-papers-are-alarmingly-common
https://www.science.org/content/article/fake-scientific-papers-are-alarmingly-common
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385964877_Fakes_in_the_History_of_Archaeology
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8216989/
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/10/new-sokal-hoax/572212/
quote:
Originally posted by Eulaliequote:
Originally posted by Corwynquote:
Originally posted by Eulaliequote:
Originally posted by banjo bill-eSome crazy stuff being reported found by new technology, Synthetic Aperture Radar, shows spiral cylinders reaching far into the Earth. Total structure may dwarf what is above ground. Any thoughts on this?
There is a great deal of evidence pointing to the age of the Egyptian pyramids dating to much older than the conventional story. The pyramids are not burial chambers, as archaeologists would have us believe, and they are likewise situated in what appears to be a careful alignment with certain stars. The jury is still out, but the new evidence is hotly disputed by conventional academics, whose funding is dependent upon repeating their narrative.
I often hear people make claims about alignment of certain stars, but it has never made sense to me. The Earth rotates and revolves, and only a single star is even close to be stationary from that perspective. If a claim is made about some other star, alignment is totally based on time, not only time of day, and time of year, but also time of millennia, as those stars have moved from where they were when the pyramids were built.
No scientist is paid for repeating what is known (other than teaching), they are paid for creating something new.
Thank you kindly.
As a scientist, I must take exception to your charming suggestion that "" no scientist is paid for repeating what is known..." Academic scientists of today are more concerned with funding than with discovery or truth. Have you read the literature on fake papers lately?
https://www.science.org/content/article/fake-scientific-papers-are-alarmingly-common
https://www.science.org/content/article/fake-scientific-papers-are-alarmingly-common
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385964877_Fakes_in_the_History_of_Archaeology
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8216989/
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/10/new-sokal-hoax/572212/
That would seem to reinforce my point. They are trying so hard to say something new that they are getting sloppy about the 'true' part.
Thank you kindly.
Sand, then dirt, then gravel, then rocks -- and finally a turtle.
quote:
Originally posted by Tim JumperSand, then dirt, then gravel, then rocks -- and finally a turtle.
What about the four elephants on top of the turtle holding the rocks, gravel and dirt?
Edited by - pinenut on 03/24/2025 17:00:47
quote:
Originally posted by pinenutquote:
Originally posted by Tim JumperSand, then dirt, then gravel, then rocks -- and finally a turtle.
What about the four elephants on top of the turtle holding the rocks, gravel and dirt?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Turtle
I heard it was turtles "all the way down".
quote:
Originally posted by randybartlettquote:
Originally posted by pinenutquote:
Originally posted by Tim JumperSand, then dirt, then gravel, then rocks -- and finally a turtle.
What about the four elephants on top of the turtle holding the rocks, gravel and dirt?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Turtle
I heard it was turtles "all the way down".
Great Sturgill tune: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=od1WhONbi8E
sañd.
Sand. Why is it these explosive announcements only get posted by wacky science groups? If this was really true, don't you think the Egyptian govt would be shouting from the roof tops? That famous Egyptologist all over the news? Jeez people are so gullible these days. Ol' PT had it wrong - suckers are now being born at 10 per minute!
Everyone knows it’s where the quantum computer is, that we developed, the runs the simulation, that we now live in.
Page: 1 2
