Somebody started a topic, asking for non-religious, but scientific, evidence for evolution.
I replied, hit SUBSCRIBE, and toddled off to bed.
When I awoke, and opened my email. there were 17 notifications of replies.
But, alas, apparently the discussion had gotten a bit too heated, and the Mods, as is their duty, had locked it.
I'm not complaining that they may have shut down a fight; just sad that I didn't get to read 17 opinions on a topic which interests me.
If it's not too much trouble, could those of you who posted replies E-MAIL me what it is you said?
Don't post it here! That would just rekindle the heat, and get this topic locked, too.
It was a lot of arguing about milkweed, fig pie, and shovel nosed cats. That always leads to a locked and hidden thread.
Mike, duty or inclination? 
quote: yes Mike I read some of that thread, I believe Nose-Picker began it? I'll start another topic likewise? Maybe it can be re-started,, but this time please stay out of senative Bho Rules! I'm Not a moderator btw
Originally posted by mike gregorySomebody started a topic, asking for non-religious, but scientific, evidence for evolution.
I replied, hit SUBSCRIBE, and toddled off to bed.
When I awoke, and opened my email. there were 17 notifications of replies.
But, alas, apparently the discussion had gotten a bit too heated, and the Mods, as is their duty, had locked it.
I'm not complaining that they may have shut down a fight; just sad that I didn't get to read 17 opinions on a topic which interests me.
If it's not too much trouble, could those of you who posted replies E-MAIL me what it is you said?
Don't post it here! That would just rekindle the heat, and get this topic locked, too.
Edited by - Roxsanne on 09/12/2024 06:37:50
I did get a message or two.
Can't help but notice how a piece of map cut around South America fits up so nicely against Africa, which strongly hints that "plate tectonics" really happens.
If you've evidence it doesn't, please send me a PRIVATE MESSAGE with a link to the evidence.
Do NOT post it here, as I'm looking for INFORMATION, not looking for a lock.
quote:
Originally posted by mike gregoryJust sad that I didn't get to read 17 opinions on a topic which interests me.
If it's not too much trouble, could those of you who posted replies E-MAIL me what it is you said?
Don't post it here! That would just rekindle the heat, and get this topic locked, too.
You missed nothing. One person posted under three identities agreeing with themselves and everyone else said this was nonsense and then I told the identities they were essentially trolling. Perhaps after I posted the remaining posts took the high ground but I rather doubt it.
Edited by - GrahamHawker on 09/12/2024 12:04:47
And, apparently, you are not allowed to reveal that ice ages happened and caused ocean levels to fall - and rise again when the ice melted. Who knew ?
Amusing lol, theres well over a hundred thousand PhDs who study this topic as part of their education\career and its as obvious as looking at your children but BHO holds the key eh?
I realise BHO has more college grads than carpenters but what do u think we might know?
Id probably start by reading everything Darwin ever wrote and see where that took me if I found the topic befuddling.
quote:
Originally posted by NotABanjoYodaAmusing lol, theres well over a hundred thousand PhDs who study this topic as part of their education\career and its as obvious as looking at your children but BHO holds the key eh?
I realise BHO has more college grads than carpenters but what do u think we might know?
Id probably start by reading everything Darwin ever wrote and see where that took me if I found the topic befuddling.
Reading Darwin to learn about evolution is a bit like reading Newton to learn about physics or Faraday to learn about electronics. Things have moved on a bit in the last 170 years. In the removed thread I recommended Dawkins 'The Greatest Show On Eartb' as a good intro to the arguments for evolution.
Faradays laws are still fundamental to electromagnetics and electrostatics and F still equals ma.
But I see some on BHO do attempt to rival scholars. Let me do a quick google search because I think I might find something 100k scientists have miseed. lol.
As an aging geologist, my learned opinion is..................................., but I know some degree'd geologists who actually believe........................................... Brad
Theories are constantly evolving
Mike, I did not participate in the 17 posts, but I did send you a couple of PMs. Brad
quote:
Originally posted by NotABanjoYodaFaradays laws are still fundamental to electromagnetics and electrostatics and F still equals ma.
But I see some on BHO do attempt to rival scholars. Let me do a quick google search because I think I might find something 100k scientists have miseed. lol.
Hmmm, "missed" or just argue certain facts and certain results? Brad
